This site is intended for healthcare professionals
cerebellar cortex under microscope, pink and purple colours
Major depressive disorder & treatment-resistant depression

MDD

Last updated: 22nd Apr 2021
Published: 22nd Apr 2021

Explore the impact of major depressive disorder (MDD) and treatment-resistant depression (TRD) to find out:

  • The consequences of failing to achieve remission in our common outcomes infographic
  • The huge socioeconomic impact in our infographic on time at work and healthcare utilisation
  • The burden of treatment-resistant depression on patients and their carers

Unmet needs for major depressive disorder

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a highly prevalent and burdensome condition that is considered to be one of the leading causes of disability1, affecting more than 264 million people worldwide2.

What is major depressive disorder?

Also referred to as clinical depression, major depressive disorder (MDD) has been previously described as more than just a singular disorder, but a spectrum of patient profiles and symptom combinations3. Hypothetically, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) can describe 227 distinct depression profiles4.

According to both the DSM-5 and International Classification of Diseases, 11th Revision (ICD-11), a diagnosis of major depressive disorder requires a presentation of depressed mood and/or anhedonia in addition to five or more key symptoms, almost daily, over a two-week period4,5:

  • Feelings of worthlessness or guilt, hopelessness
  • Suicide ideation, plan, or attempt
  • Fatigue or loss of energy
  • Increased or decreased sleep
  • Weight gain or loss
  • Diminished ability to think or concentrate, or indecisiveness
  • Psychomotor retardation or agitation.

The monitoring and management of these symptoms is essential for the prevention of psychiatric emergency, which can present as suicidal ideation and requires urgent treatment6.

What is suicidal ideation?

Suicidal ideation is the act of thinking about, considering or planning suicide7. In the worst cases, it can lead to suicidal behaviour and death7. Suicide is currently the cause of over 800,000 deaths per year8 and is the second leading cause of death in 15–29-year-olds1.

In the United Kingdom, over 90% of patients who have died from suicide had a previous visit with their GP within weeks to months of their death9. Treatments, such as first-line selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), can however take weeks before seeing improvements in symptoms10. There is therefore an unmet need for antidepressants that quickly attenuate depressive symptoms, with a faster onset of action than conventional antidepressants, for patients at an increased risk of suicide10–12.

Therapeutics that antagonise glutaminergic N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors (NMDAR), such as esketamine, have recently drawn attention due to the accumulating evidence of their rapid and sustained antidepressant effects in treatment-resistant patients13. Various other NMDAR antagonists and modulators are currently in clinical trials, including arketamine, an optical isomer of esketamine; and rapastinel13.

The introduction of rapid acting therapeutics has also produced a need for clinically valid measures that can detect rapid changes in suicidal ideation, such as the Suicide Ideation and Behavior Assessment Tool (SIBAT), which has previously demonstrated validity as an assessment tool for suicide ideation and behaviour14.

When does major depressive disorder become treatment-resistant depression?

A complex interaction of intrinsic pharmacological properties and extrinsic clinical, environmental, and genetic factors underlies the individual patient response to antidepressant treatment15.

Response to antidepressant treatment is commonly defined as16:

  1. >50% improvement on a depression rating scale, such as the ‘Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression’.
  2. “Much improved” or “very much improved” on the ‘Clinical Global Impressions – Severity of Illness’ and ‘Clinical Global Impressions – Improvement’ scales.

Ultimately, the goal of antidepressant treatment is remission; the absence of depressive symptoms17. However, this goal is a continual challenge as approximately 50% to 70% of patients do not achieve remission after receiving at least one adequately dosed antidepressant treatment in clinical trials18–20. This incomplete remission is associated with a range of persistent symptoms (Figure 1)21 when compared to patients with full remission of major depressive disorder.

Common residual symptoms of patients who fail to achieve remission

Figure 1: Common residual symptoms of patients who fail to achieve remission (Adapted from Stahl et al21).

The persistent symptoms of incomplete remission can lead to21–24:

  • Higher risk of relapse
  • Greater chronicity with smaller durations between episodes
  • Impairments in occupational performance and social function
  • Increased risk of suicide

A systematic approach to assessing patient responses to treatment is therefore essential for aiding treatment decision-making. A recent report showed that clinically meaningful and substantial changes can be determined in function with the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS), and in depressive symptoms with the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)25.

How prevalent is treatment-resistant depression?

The definition of treatment resistance varies, but a commonly used definition of treatment-resistant depression is the failure of remission following at least two antidepressant treatments from separate pharmacological classes at an appropriate time and dose26.

However, with a large variation of definitions, it is difficult to determine the specific prevalence of treatment-resistant depression. Using the most commonly used definitions, it has been suggested that treatment-resistant depression affects approximately 20% – 30% of people with major depressive disorder27. If defined as an absence of remission, this can rise to as high as 60%27.

The STAR*D trial, the largest open-label trial undertaken to examine the treatment of major depressive disorder (N = 2,876)28, revealed that about one-third of patients who commenced treatment remained depressed29. Enrolled patients began with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) treatment and were then managed through an algorithm-guided acute phase treatment over the course of five visits in a 12-week course28.

The wide variety of treatments included, norepinephrine–dopamine reuptake inhibitors (NDRI), serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRI), tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOI), lithium, and thyroxine28.

The results of the seminal STAR*D study show that about one-third of patients who commenced treatment remained depressed even following up to four sequential treatment trials29.

A majority of patients who lack a response to first-line agents also fail to respond to combinations of newer generation antidepressants and adjunctive second generation antipsychotics30,31.

In addition to a lack of effective treatments, a disproportionate share of personal, medical, and societal burdens is attributable to treatment-resistant depression. There is therefore a great unmet need for newer treatment options that utilise alternative mechanisms of action, such as glutaminergic neurotransmission32, for patients unresponsive to conventional therapies.

Click here to learn more about the biology of treatment-resistant depression

Socioeconomic impact of treatment-resistant depression

As a leading cause of disability1, major depressive disorder (MDD) is a huge burden that can disrupt the ability to work and can lead to absenteeism and ‘presenteeism’ – decreased productivity at work33. While specific cognitive impairments associated with major depressive disorder have yet to be causally linked, processing speed, attention, learning, memory, and executive function have been found to be impacted33.

Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) in particular has a significant socioeconomic impact on healthcare systems, patients, and their families34. The largest driver of this socioeconomic burden is frequent hospitalisation, depression severity that can reduce health-related quality of life (HRQoL), health status, and a reduced ability to work34.

What are the health associated costs of treatment-resistant depression?

Brain disorders pose a serious health challenge to social and healthcare systems in Europe35. It has been estimated that major depressive disorder alone affects 30.3 million people in Europe with an estimated cost of €91.9 billion35. Around 41% of this cost was due to direct healthcare or non-medical related costs and 59% was due to indirect costs, such as absenteeism from work.

A US-based study found that annual direct healthcare costs can be 40% higher for treatment-resistant depression patients36.

The direct costs for treatment-resistant depression are even higher. A US-based retrospective, seven year observational study of patients receiving antidepressant therapy (N = 78,477) found that the annual direct healthcare costs can be 40% higher for treatment-resistant depression patients than non-treatment-resistant depression patients (P <0.001)36. This was due to increased hospitalisations, emergency department visits, outpatient services, outpatient prescription treatments, and adjunctive medications36. Additionally, caring for patients with treatment-resistant depression reduces the economic productivity for caregivers.

Similarly, a later study by Knoth et al. investigated associations between inadequacy of treatment response, determined using the 8-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-8), and health outcomes. Of the 5,988 patients included in the study, partial response and non-response to treatment was associated with greater emergency department utilisation and hospitalisation (P = 0.05 and P <0.01, respectively)37.

A study across five European countries (France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom) found that healthcare resource utilisation was higher in the treatment-resistant depressive patients compared to non-treatment-resistant depressive patients and the general population (Figure 2)38.

Healthcare resource utilisation outcomes among TRD and non-TRD respondents compared to general population

Figure 2. Healthcare resource utilisation outcomes among TRD and non-TRD respondents compared to general population (Adapted from Jaffe et al38). ER, emergency room; FP, family practitioner; GP, general practitioner; HCP, healthcare professional; nTRD, non-treatment-resistant depression;TRD, treatment-resistant depression.

Overall, the odds of having visited a healthcare professional, general/family practitioner, needing hospitalisation, and visiting an emergency room were significantly higher in the treatment-resistant depression group (P < 0.001)38.

How does treatment-resistant depression impact time at work?

As seen in the Knoth et al. study, partial response and non-response to treatment in patients with major depressive disorder were associated with lower employment (P = 0.01 and P <0.01, respectively) and work productivity loss (P <0.01, for both)37. Among patients in full-time employment with treatment-resistant depression, non-complete responders were 2.37 times more likely to experience absenteeism and 4.17 times more likely to experience presenteeism than responders to treatment (P <0.01)37.

This can further exacerbate mental health issues, as employment is known to have a beneficial effect on various aspects of mental health, including symptoms, self-esteem, social ability, and quality of life39. Similarly, the Jaffe et al. study that revealed a higher level of healthcare resource utilisation (HRU) also found a significantly higher relative risk of absenteeism, presenteeism, overall work impairment, and activity impairment in patients with treatment-resistant depression than in the non-treatment-resistant depressive population (Figure 3) (P < 0.001)38.

Work productivity and activity impairment-general health outcomes among TRD and non-TRD respondents

Figure 3. Work productivity and activity impairment-general health outcomes among TRD and non-TRD respondents (Adapted from Jaffe et al38). nTRD, non-treatment-resistant depression; TRD, treatment-resistant depression.

In the United Kingdom, the need for improved treatments is becoming ever more important as mental disorders have become the most common reason to receive state-funded benefits, comprising approximately 46.5% of all claims39. Of these, 44.2% were classified as having a depressive disorder39.

The global impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has also had a huge effect on mental health and employment.

Fears associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) outbreak and mass lockdowns impacting employment are predicted to lead to increases in mental disorders and suicide40.

Higher rates of depression (14.6% to 48.3%), and psychological distress (34.43% to 38%), have been seen during the COVID-19 pandemic in populations from China, Spain, Italy, Iran, the United States, Turkey, Nepal, and Denmark40. Prevention and treatment strategies of mental disorders, such as major depressive disorder, are therefore urgently needed in addition to the need to reduce viral transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)41.

Managing treatment-resistant depression in major depressive disorder

Improve your approach to treating patients with depression and put your knowledge to the test in this EACCME® accredited course for psychiatrists, GPs, and neurologists. Receive 1 CME credit for successful completion.
Accreditation date: 12th July 2021.

Enrol

Patient and carer burden for treatment-resistant depression

The burden of major depressive disorder (MDD) and treatment-resistant depression (TRD) goes beyond the economic impact and is considerable for carers, patients, and their families. While patients can experience many impactful symptoms, including suicide ideation, carers are also at risk of developing mental health issues and exhaustion.

How does treatment-resistant depression influence suicide risk?

While increased mortality in depression can result from physical illnesses, it is often associated with suicide. In patients with treatment-resistant depression, risk of suicide has been shown to be elevated, especially among patients with previous suicide attempts24. However, the exact relation between treatment-resistant depression and suicide-related outcomes is not yet completely understood42.

Olin et al. however showed that a partial response to a treatment can still have a beneficial impact on suicide risk in patients with treatment-resistant depression43. Their results highlighted that a response to a treatment (with a >50% reduction in MADRS score) and a partial clinical response to a treatment (with a MADRS score reduction between 25–29%) reduces the risk of suicidal behaviour43.

When the burden of treatment-resistant depression becomes great enough, some patients consider assisted dying where available43,44

Some countries in Europe, particularly Belgium and The Netherlands, allow assisted dying for non-terminal illness, including mental disorders, under strict conditions44.The United States also now allows assisted dying in four states, however it is restricted to terminal physical illness45.

What is the impact on quality of life for people with treatment-resistant depression?

In a study by Lex et al., the impact on quality of life was found to be high in people with treatment-resistant depression, with 81% of participants describing their quality of life as “poor” or “very poor” (N = 79)46. A further 70% reported themselves as being “dissatisfied” or “very dissatisfied” with their health46. Based on international normative data, Figure 4 shows the distributions of the standardised z-scores and highlights how physical, psychological, and social quality of life are particularly impacted46.

Distributions of World Health Organization quality of life scale scores across physical, psychological, emotional, and environmental domains among people with treatment-resistant depression

Figure 4. Distributions of World Health Organization quality of life scale scores across physical, psychological, emotional, and environmental domains among people with treatment-resistant depression (Adapted from Lex et al46). WHOQOL-BREF, World Health Organization Quality Of Life scale.

The average physical and psychological quality of life scores were two standard deviations below the international norm and social quality of life scores were one standard deviation below46. The impact on environmental quality of life was however consistent with international norms46.

This highlights the need to target quality of life as a clinical outcome when developing treatments as well as the need to assess quality of life when caring for patients.

Does the burden of treatment-resistant depression affect carers?

Caregivers also face significant burdens when caring for patients of treatment-resistant depression, such as dependence and fear of suicide, that stem from the emotional, physical, social, and financial problems associated with caring for a depressed patient47,48.

Rane et al. reported high levels of psychiatric caseness among informal caregivers of treatment-resistant depressive patients compared to controls (34% vs 4%, P = 0.009)49. This may be further worsened by the stigma associated with mental illness. This perceived stigma has been shown in a previous study that found 43% of caregivers (N = 481) of people with mental illness felt they were devalued50. This stigma has been found to increase depressive symptoms in caregivers51, leading to complications for the patient in their care.

Click here to learn more about the biology of treatment-resistant depression

References

  1. The World Health Organisation (WHO). Depression. 2020. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/depression. Accessed 18 January 2021.
  2. James SL, Abate D, Abate KH, Abay SM, Abbafati C, Abbasi N, et al. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 Diseases and Injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2018;392(10159):1789–1858.
  3. Demyttenaere K, Van Duppen Z. The Impact of (the Concept of) Treatment-Resistant Depression: An Opinion Review. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2019;22(2):85–92.
  4. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition. 2013. Arlington, VA.
  5. World Health Organization (WHO). International classification of diseases for mortality and morbidity statistics (11th Revision). 2018. https://icd.who.int/en. Accessed 8 March 2021.
  6. Weber AN, Michail M, Thompson A, Fiedorowicz JG. Psychiatric Emergencies: Assessing and Managing Suicidal Ideation. Med Clin North Am. 2017;101(3):553–571.
  7. Klonsky ED, May AM, Saffer BY. Suicide, Suicide Attempts, and Suicidal Ideation. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2016;12:307–330.
  8. Naghavi M. Global, regional, and national burden of suicide mortality 1990 to 2016: systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. BMJ. 2019;364:l94.
  9. Saini P, Chantler K, Kapur N. General practitioners’ perspectives on primary care consultations for suicidal patients. Heal Soc Care Community. 2016;24(3):260–269.
  10. Machado-Vieira R, Baumann J, Wheeler-Castillo C, Latov D, Henter ID, Salvadore G, et al. The timing of antidepressant effects: A comparison of diverse pharmacological and somatic treatments. Pharmaceuticals. 2010;3(1):19–41.
  11. Duman RS. Ketamine and rapid-acting antidepressants: A new era in the battle against depression and suicide. F1000Research. 2018;7:659.
  12. Machado-Vieira R, Salvadore G, Luckenbaugh DA, Manji HK, Zarate CA. Rapid onset of antidepressant action: A new paradigm in the research and treatment of major depressive disorder. J Clin Psychiatry. 2008;69(6):946–958.
  13. Hashimoto K. Rapid‐acting antidepressant ketamine, its metabolites and other candidates: A historical overview and future perspective. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2019;73(10):613–627.
  14. Alphs L, Fu DJ, Williamson D, Turkoz I, Jamieson C, Revicki D, et al. Suicide Ideation and Behavior Assessment Tool (SIBAT): Evaluation of Intra- and Inter-Rater Reliability, Validity, and Mapping to Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment. Psychiatry Res. 2020;294:113495.
  15. Santarsieri D, Schwartz TL. Antidepressant efficacy and side-effect burden: A quick guide for clinicians. Drugs Context. 2015;4. doi:10.7573/dic.212290.
  16. Nierenberg AA, DeCecco LM. Definitions of antidepressant treatment response, remission, nonresponse, partial response, and other relevant outcomes: A focus on treatment-resistant depression. J Clin Psychiatry. 2001;62(SUPPL. 16):5-9+35.
  17. Koenig AM, Thase ME. First-line pharmacotherapies for depression - What is the best choice? Pol Arch Med Wewn. 2009;119(7–8):478–486.
  18. Fava M. Diagnosis and definition of treatment-resistant depression. Biol Psychiatry. 2003;53(8):649–659.
  19. Kennedy SH, Lam RW. Enhancing outcomes in the management of treatment resistant depression: A focus on atypical antipsychotics. Bipolar Disord Suppl. 2003;5(2):36–47.
  20. Trivedi MH, Daly EJ. Treatment strategies to improve and sustain remission in major depressive disorder. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2008;10(4):377–384.
  21. Stahl SM. Stahl’s Essential Psychopharmacology. 4th Editio. 2013. Cambridge University Press.
  22. Judd LL, Paulus MJ, Schettler PJ, Akiskal HS, Endicott J, Leon AC, et al. Does incomplete recovery from first lifetime major depressive episode herald a chronic course of illness? Am J Psychiatry. 2000;157(9):1501–1504.
  23. Romera I, Perez V, Menchón JM, Delgado-Cohen H, Polavieja P, Gilaberte I. Social and occupational functioning impairment in patients in partial versus complete remission of a major depressive disorder episode. A six-month prospective epidemiological study. Eur Psychiatry. 2010;25(1):58–65.
  24. Reutfors J, Andersson TM-L, Tanskanen A, DiBernardo A, Li G, Brandt L, et al. Risk Factors for Suicide and Suicide Attempts Among Patients With Treatment-Resistant Depression: Nested Case-Control Study. Arch Suicide Res. 2019;1–15.
  25. Turkoz I, Alphs L, Singh J, Jamieson C, Daly E, Shawi M, et al. Clinically Meaningful Changes on Depressive Symptom Measures and Patient‐Reported Outcomes in Patients with Treatment‐Resistant Depression. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2020. doi:10.1111/acps.13260.
  26. Berlim MT, Fleck MP, Turecki G. Current trends in the assessment and somatic treatment of resistant/refractory major depression: An overview. Ann Med. 2008;40(2):149–159.
  27. Fekadu A, Wooderson SC, Markopoulo K, Donaldson C, Papadopoulos A, Cleare AJ. What happens to patients with treatment-resistant depression? A systematic review of medium to long term outcome studies. J Affect Disord. 2009;116(1–2):4–11.
  28. Sinyor M, Schaffer A, Levitt A. The Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression (STAR*D) trial: A review. Can J Psychiatry. 2010;55(3):126–135.
  29. Rush AJ, Trivedi MH, Wisniewski SR, Nierenberg AA, Stewart JW, Warden D, et al. Acute and longer-term outcomes in depressed outpatients requiring one or several treatment steps: A STAR*D report. Am J Psychiatry. 2006;163(11):1905–1917.
  30. Thase ME. Antidepressant combinations: Widely used, but far from empirically validated. Can J Psychiatry. 2011;56(6):317–323.
  31. Thase ME. Adverse Effects of Second-Generation Antipsychotics as Adjuncts to Antidepressants: Are the Risks Worth the Benefits? Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2016;39(3):477–486.
  32. Dale E, Bang-Andersen B, Sánchez C. Emerging mechanisms and treatments for depression beyond SSRIs and SNRIs. Biochem Pharmacol. 2015;95(2):81–97.
  33. Evans VC, Chan SS, Iverson GL, Bond DJ, Yatham LN, Lam RW. Systematic review of neurocognition and occupational functioning in major depressive disorder. Neuropsychiatry (London). 2013;3(1):97–105.
  34. Johnston KM, Powell LC, Anderson IM, Szabo S, Cline S. The burden of treatment-resistant depression: A systematic review of the economic and quality of life literature. J Affect Disord. 2019;242:195–210.
  35. Olesen J, Gustavsson A, Svensson M, Wittchen HU, Jönsson B. The economic cost of brain disorders in Europe. Eur J Neurol. 2012;19(1):155–162.
  36. Gibson TB, Jing Y, Carls GS, Kim E, Bagalman JE, Burton WN, et al. Cost burden of treatment resistance in patients with depression. Am J Manag Care. 2010;16(5):370–7.
  37. Knoth R, Bolge S, Kim E, Tran Q-V. Effect of inadequate response to treatment in patients with depression. Am J Manag Care. 2010;16(8):e188-96.
  38. Jaffe DH, Rive B, Denee TR. The humanistic and economic burden of treatment-resistant depression in Europe: A cross-sectional study. BMC Psychiatry. 2019;19(1):247.
  39. Viola S, Moncrieff J. Claims for sickness and disability benefits owing to mental disorders in the UK: trends from 1995 to 2014. BJPsych Open. 2016;2(1):18–24.
  40. Xiong J, Lipsitz O, Nasri F, Lui LMW, Gill H, Phan L, et al. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on mental health in the general population: A systematic review. J Affect Disord. 2020;277:55–64.
  41. Verdolini N, Amoretti S, Montejo L, García-Rizo C, Hogg B, Mezquida G, et al. Resilience and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Affect Disord. 2021;283:156–164.
  42. Pfeiffer PN, Kim HM, Ganoczy D, Zivin K, Valenstein M. Treatment-resistant depression and risk of suicide. Suicide Life-Threatening Behav. 2013;43(4):356–365.
  43. Olin B, Jayewardene AK, Bunker M, Moreno F. Mortality and Suicide Risk in Treatment-Resistant Depression: An Observational Study of the Long-Term Impact of Intervention. PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e48002.
  44. Steinbock B. Physician-Assisted Death and Severe, Treatment-Resistant Depression. Hastings Cent Rep. 2017;47(5):30–42.
  45. Gostin LO, Roberts AE. Physician-assisted dying: A turning point? JAMA - J Am Med Assoc. 2016;315(3):249–250.
  46. Lex H, Ginsburg Y, Sitzmann AF, Grayhack C, Maixner DF, Mickey BJ. Quality of life across domains among individuals with treatment-resistant depression. J Affect Disord. 2019;243:401–407.
  47. Tabeleão V, Tomasi E, de Avila Quevedo L. A Randomized, Controlled Trial of the Effectiveness of a Psychoeducational Intervention on Family Caregivers of Patients with Mental Disorders. Community Ment Health J. 2018;54(2):211–217.
  48. Van Wijngaarden B, Schene AH, Koeter MWJ. Family caregiving in depression: Impact on caregivers’ daily life, distress, and help seeking. J Affect Disord. 2004;81(3):211–222.
  49. Rane LJ, Fekadu A, Papadopoulos AS, Wooderson SC, Poon L, Markopoulou K, et al. Psychological and physiological effects of caring for patients with treatment-resistant depression. Psychol Med. 2012;42(9):1825–1833.
  50. Struening EL, Perlick DA, Link BG, Hellman F, Herman D, Sirey JA. Stigma as a barrier to recovery: The extent to which caregivers believe most people devalue consumers and their families. Psychiatr Serv. 2001;52(12):1633–1638.
  51. Phelan JC, Bromet EJ, Link BG. Psychiatric illness and family stigma. Schizophr Bull. 1998;24(1):115–126.